The things that make me laugh, weep, and live.
Published on October 23, 2004 By Shulamite In Misc
When I was in college I learned that I had to spend a great deal on a course that I didn’t need. The course was a test preparation course. I was a little bitter because the college required it and I didn’t need it. I felt duly prepared for the test. I found out that the college was in trouble for one ethnicity on campus not having a 95% pass rate on the test or higher. Rather than discriminate and make only those of that ethnicity take the course, EVERYONE had to pay a hunk of cash, do the time, and wait to take the test. It doesn’t sound like too bad of a plan. But wait. In our area, there might be 2 pacific islanders at our college. If one doesn’t pass that test, guess what? We’ve got a 50% fail rate for that ethnicity on the test. That may be an exaggerated example, but you see how the numbers can lie. I asked several questions in response.

Why do they aggregate the data into races in the first place? Isn’t that a little racist itself? My source said it was not for him to say.
How do they know our ethnicity? We bubble it in on the test, next to all our other personal info.
Is it required? By law, no.
So I can choose not to bubble it in? It would seem so.
What if everyone decided not to bubble it in? What then? My source said it was not for him to encourage such behavior.

I decided right then and there I’d never answer another ethnicity question again on any sort of paperwork ever. It just wasn’t to my advantage. Ever.


Comments
on Oct 23, 2004
Really, for some reason white males tend to score higher on the SAT's, I might change my race to a minority then flunk twice, then retake it correctly and enter white... I mean then whites seem really smart if blacks are having trouble writing thier names.

Note... this was not racially oriented, it could also be mexicans, the chinese are just to damn smart for anyone to fall for that.

oh yes, and again, this was posted at Abeeda.com, ect. ect. If you wish to continue the discussion go there, if you don't want your post there, delete it, otherwise enjoy browsing around the site and my response.
on Oct 23, 2004
sorry, I had assumed those of you in the US would defy the global stereotype that you are complete and utter morons and not funny. Obviously I was wrong. Enough to make one wish well on the jihadis.
on Oct 24, 2004
David, maybe you didn't get my article. I'm saying for people looking for evidence that some races do more poorly than others is racist. Perhaps your "global stereotype" is ill-informed because you've not dwelled within our borders nor dealt with our problems. And calling names isn't exactly an educated response you know. How does "bubbling in" your ethnicity on forms, tests, and the like ever help you? How does it help others? How, in these modern times, does it do anything but separate us into neat little groups? What about those who don't fit into these categories so neatly? Maybe you don't know anyone who can select three or four of the choices, but I'd wager 50% or more Americans can in all honesty. (The term "ethnicity" inaccurately meaning "race" as it does on these tests and governmental forms.)

Why don't you face the frustration of the masses instead of name-calling? What does one do when one is from a multi-faceted society? Embrace and include or segregate and deliniate?

Capi -- I'm not sure I get your response.... but I think you're trying to be funny and not viscious.
on Oct 24, 2004
The course shouldn't be mandatory in the first place. In fact, no course in college should be mandatory. Are the students not there because they want to learn? I am an English major and stuck in a science course which I will never revisit, and so consequently I don't care about it. But I do have to care about it because if I don't it screws with my GPA.

As far as the comment that instead of discriminating they made everyone take the course, I think in this case it was the lesser of two evils. Had they discriminated, they would have opened a far more dangerous can of worms.
on Oct 24, 2004
Surely the more dangerous can would have been opened without question: what I'm saying is why did they produce the cans? Why do we allow them to?